| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Authenticated: | #27081556 |
| X-Provags-ID: | V01U2FsdGVkX19TBmYn+uNTbhM/WuEVaqlChulo+02DUrWY/HnNyD |
| gpfW5tziqM+La8 | |
| From: | Juan Manuel Guerrero <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | DT_SOCK and S_IFSOCK. |
| Date: | Sun, 4 May 2008 00:31:28 +0200 |
| User-Agent: | KMail/1.9.5 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Message-Id: | <200805040031.30990.juan.guerrero@gmx.de> |
| X-Y-GMX-Trusted: | 0 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
dirent.h defines DT_SOCK but AFAIK DTTOIF is not able to convert it into an st_mode value (S_IFSOCK). Is this intentional or am I missing something? The reason for the question is that some code of findutils makes the assumption that if DT_SOCK is defined this automaticaly implies that also S_IFSOCK must be available/defined. This is not true for DJGPP. Clarification will be welcome. Regards, Juan M. Guerrero
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |