X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From:	<ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200501050102.j0512vU6013697@speedy.ludd.ltu.se>
Subject:	Re: More complaints from tests/libclink/check
In-Reply-To:	<jnamt0hbni7sacd529hkh8tqq7eelc0qob@4ax.com> "from Brian Inglis
	at Jan 4, 2005 04:56:32 pm"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:02:57 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-ltu-MailScanner-Information:	Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ltu-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From:	ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Brian Inglis:
> Does strtok_r.c define _strtok_r()?

Nope. It does define __strtok_r() by #including <libc/stubs.h> (and
strtok.c likewisely calls __strtok_r()).

> Does the prototype declaration for strtok_r() appear in string.h
> between #ifndef _STRICT_ANSI and #ifndef _POSIX_SOURCE? 

Yes.

> The time *_r() functions make most sense if implemented in ctime.c, as
> static functions there do most of the work. 

It shouldn't matter if you stub them and #include <libc/stubs.h>
there.

Hmmm... Perhaps it would be better if I just added strtok_r() to the
same file as strtok() is in? Anyone?

> I found I had to prototype the _*_r() functions in ctime.c to quiet
> 3.4.* compiler warnings. 

Weird. Are you sure you had added their prototypes to <time.h>?


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -