| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
| From: | <ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se> |
| Message-Id: | <200410291605.i9TG5pwR022734@speedy.ludd.ltu.se> |
| Subject: | Re: gcc-3.4 and djgpp/src/debug/common/dbgcom.c |
| In-Reply-To: | <200410282119.28711.pavenis@latnet.lv> "from Andris Pavenis at Oct |
| 28, 2004 09:19:28 pm" | |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:05:51 +0200 (CEST) |
| X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)] |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-ltu-MailScanner-Information: | Please contact the ISP for more information |
| X-ltu-MailScanner: | Found to be clean |
| X-MailScanner-From: | ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to Andris Pavenis:
> On Wednesday 27 October 2004 19:43, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Can we put it as an input operand of that big asm? We don't have to
> > use it, just add it.
> >
> > asm("
> > ...
> > " : "g" (forced_test));
>
> Unfortunatelly it doesn't work. Both gcc-3.4.2 and gcc-4.0.0 20041014 rejects
> extended inline assembler outside the procedures.
I suspect that then you could put it in any function... But... Well...
Is there any reason why we shouldn't use "__attribute__((unused))"?
Or doesn't that work either?
Right,
MartinS
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |