Message-ID:	<003601c28451$de453490$0100a8c0@p4>
From:	"Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<001401c28231$db1d3cd0$0100a8c0 AT p4> <001201c282f0$7267c380$0100a8c0 AT p4> <006f01c283e0$1f76d670$0100a8c0 AT p4> <2110-Mon04Nov2002215350+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject:	Re: LIBC 2.04 new function atoll() and STDLIB long long changes
Date:	Tue, 5 Nov 2002 09:30:36 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> > In the future could there be a problem in the semantics which will cause
a
> > failure of long long v's long long int with regards to C++ which does
type
> > mangaling when generating a functionn name.
>
> You mean, g++ mangles "long long foo" differently from "long long int
> foo"?
No not at the moment, but what about the future.....

- Raw text -