From:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<10209171501.AA20863@clio.rice.edu>
Subject:	Re: ntvdmpat.exe and Win2K SP3 (fwd)
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 17 Sep 2002 10:01:47 -0500 (CDT)
In-Reply-To:	<250B3114DA16D511B82C00E0094005F809D3164D@MSGWAW11> from "=?iso-8859-2?Q?Wojciech_Ga=B3=B1zka?=" at Sep 17, 2002 11:43:45 AM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Perhaps they have used more optimizing compiler that produced different 
> binary output, without actually changing anything.

While this could be - we ended up using the value of a register in the
patch which may no longer be available if different/higher optimization
was used.  Trying to analyze the code again in that detail to create
a patch for Win2K (or XP) probably isn't going to happen soon.  With
a refreshed tool chain we didn't find as much need to  work around the bug.

- Raw text -