Date:	Mon, 10 Jun 2002 08:24:13 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: uclock() on Win2K
In-Reply-To:	<10206100352.AA20367@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1020610082321.21236I@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 9 Jun 2002 sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu wrote:

> On my Win95 box it doesn't work either - the timer seems to stay on
> rate generator (so it's not continuous); there are jumps in the time.

It worked for me on two Windows 9X machines.  So I guess this is 
version-dependent.

> Document as only reliable under DOS?

Yes, it seems like this is the best we can do.

- Raw text -