| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
| From: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
| Message-Id: | <200202091302.OAA01888@father.ludd.luth.se> |
| Subject: | Re: Alignment problem |
| In-Reply-To: | <200202091234.g19CYUV17283@envy.delorie.com> from DJ Delorie at "Feb 9, 2002 07:34:30 am" |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Date: | Sat, 9 Feb 2002 14:02:48 +0100 (MET) |
| X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to DJ Delorie:
> can't use the pointer to store an "int". I don't know if the x86 has
> any memory access opcodes that *require* an aligned address. If it
> does, then the returned pointer must be at least that aligned.
I'm not sure it's a realistic example, but I think the {L,S}{I,G}DT
instructions are some examples. Perhaps the only ones?
Right,
MartinS
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |