X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 09:05:14 +0200 (WET)
From:	Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
X-Sender:	pavenis AT ieva06
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
	ST001906 AT HRZ1 DOT HRZ DOT TU-Darmstadt DOT De
Subject:	Re: conflicting types for bzero (gcc303)
In-Reply-To:	<3069-Wed06Feb2002221302+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Message-ID:	<Pine.A41.4.05.10202070900520.6950-100000@ieva06>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> > From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> > Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:05:59 -0600 (CST)
> > 
> > #if __GNUC__ >= 3
> > #define bcopy(s, d, n) memcpy(d, s, n)
> > #define bzero(s, n) memset(s, 0, n)
> > #else
> > void *	bcopy(const void *_a, void *_b, size_t _len);
> > void *	bzero(void *ptr, size_t _len);

I think we should use (untested yet)

#define bzero(s,n) __builtin_bzero(s,n)

for gcc-3.X

Andris


> > #endif
> > 
> > 
> > Or can the prototypes be removed completely with GCC 3.x if they are
> > built-in?
> 
> I think we should modify bzero and bcopy so that they fit the
> (universally accepted) prototypes GCC expects.
> 
> 
> 

- Raw text -