X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:43:23 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<2110-Fri11Jan2002094322+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<10201110400.AA20996@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject:	Re: frlist.c proposed patch
References:	<10201110400 DOT AA20996 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:00:01 -0600 (CST)
> 
> This fixes the problem of incorrect flushing of a handle if the parent has
> closed handle 3 or 4.  Test program _close(3); _close(4); system("test.exe");
> The child opens a file writes and exits.  without patch it doesn't flush,
> with patch it does.

Thanks.

> This isn't a complete fix for all cases, but it 
> does make sure we don't set up extra file structures which will be closed
> that shouldn't.

What would it take to solve the more general problem?

> Should I use fileno() or hard code (efficiency vs data driven)

If you #include <libc/file.h>, fileno will be a macro instead of a
function.

> Should we invalidate the handle in the file structure if not open?

Sorry, I don't understand what does ``invalidate the handle in the
file structure'' mean.

- Raw text -