Date:	Mon, 18 Dec 2000 09:45:44 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc-2.95.* for DJGPP
In-Reply-To:	<3A3D1EAB.6EEADF2F@softhome.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1001218094517.15310F-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Could someone please look into this and see why doesn't libio compile
> > cleanly?  I'm worried that more of such problems will creep into
> > libstdc++ if we don't fix them and send patches to maintainers.
> 
> IMHO we should at first check if this is still applicable to libstdc++-v3.

Yes, of course.  I thought it was in libstdc++-v3 as well.

- Raw text -