Message-Id:	<5.0.2.1.0.20001213195731.025c3550@pop5.banet.net>
X-Sender:	usbanet DOT farley3 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date:	Wed, 13 Dec 2000 20:00:39 -0500
To:	Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
From:	"Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Locking fcntl changes #2
Cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<200012130834.JAA15590@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
References:	<5 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20001212202947 DOT 025a4c70 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

At 09:34 AM 12/13/00 +0100, Martin Stromberg wrote:
<Snipped>
 >>  >Why are you using lseek() here and not llseek?
 >>
 >> Because this is the 31-bit section, not the FAT32 section.  I use
 >> llseek in the FAT32 section.
 >
 >But llseek will do the job as well and better.

Understood.  With Eli's comments after my investigation of filelength 
also in mind, I agree that it should be llseek consistently.

Although I might also just modify filelength itself to use llseek, I 
will still change all of fcntl's lseek's to llseek's.

---------------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org OR
                      pjfarley AT banet DOT net)

- Raw text -