Date:	Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:46:00 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id:	<7458-Fri27Oct2000114600+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5h
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<200010270805.KAA00023@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> (message from Martin
	Stromberg on Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:05:31 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject:	Re: Bash 2.04 beta 6a
References:	<200010270805 DOT KAA00023 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 10:05:31 +0200 (MET DST)
> 
> bash$ perl5 -e 'system("bash -c \"echo \$-\n\"");'
> s
> 
> Hence perl's bash invocation is non-interactive.

I'm not sure this is the correct way of testing this.  The original
command invoked ECHO differently ("echo #foo|"), which might be
invoking the shell in some subtly different way, e.g. because it
redirects the standard handles.  I think you need to test the
interactive/non-interactive aspect in the same way.

- Raw text -