Message-Id:	<4.3.1.0.20001024220333.00b166d0@pop5.banet.net>
X-Sender:	usbanet DOT farley3 AT pop5 DOT banet DOT net
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date:	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:06:06 -0400
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
From:	"Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>
Subject:	Re: New versions of perl require "flock" or working "fcntl(fh,
	F_SETLK/W,...)"
Cc:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1001024110138.24828P-100000@is>
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1001024092921 DOT 24828F-100000 AT is>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

At 11:02 AM 10/24/00 +0200, you wrote:
<Snipped>
 >On closer look, lockf is not a Posix function.

OK, then we stick with flock, right?
---------------------------------------------------------
Peter J. Farley III (pjfarley AT dorsai DOT org OR
                      pjfarley AT banet DOT net)

- Raw text -