Date:	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:02:15 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Peter J. Farley III" <pjfarley AT banet DOT net>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: New versions of perl require "flock" or working "fcntl(fh, F_SETLK/W,...)"
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1001024092921.24828F-100000@is>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1001024110138.24828P-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, I wrote:

> Btw, what about lockf?  It has similar functionality and might be even
> Posix (anybody knows?).

On closer look, lockf is not a Posix function.

- Raw text -