Date:	Thu, 14 Sep 2000 11:07:54 -0400
Message-Id:	<200009141507.LAA04685@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<200009140446.GAA28575@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> (message from Martin
	Stromberg on Thu, 14 Sep 2000 06:46:39 +0200 (MET DST))
Subject:	Re: (fwd) startup-code
References:	<200009140446 DOT GAA28575 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> So the use in dpmiexcp.c is correct? Wouldn't it be better if the
> symbol was named "_end" or "__end"? Is it possible to change?

The existence of both end and _end is historical and typical of older
unix platforms.

- Raw text -