www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Fri, 4 Aug 2000 13:04:05 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <200008041704.NAA31305@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <398AF6AD.71958EE2@softhome.net> (message from Laurynas Biveinis |
on Fri, 04 Aug 2000 19:00:29 +0200) | |
Subject: | Re: Better GCC news |
References: | <397CA24B DOT 7788CBB0 AT softhome DOT net> <398AF6AD DOT 71958EE2 AT softhome DOT net> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> So nobody wants to become DJGPP port maintainer? It would, uhm, a > bit strange - we kept complaining loudly about unreviewed patches > and reject opportunity to speed things up. > > In particular, I'm interested in Mark's opinion, because he IMHO is > best suited person for this. FYI I've become a maintainer for the cygwin parts of gcc, and I mentioned to Gerald that I might as well be a DJGPP maintainer as well, although I'd prefer that the people who actually port GCC to DJGPP get involved (as I'm usually pretty busy).
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |