Sender:	aoliva AT guarana DOT lsd DOT ic DOT unicamp DOT br
To:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Cc:	law AT cygnus DOT com, gcc-patches AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: PATCH: enabling ggc-page with simple malloc()
References:	<18258 DOT 964726841 AT upchuck> <39809554 DOT 400D6AEB AT softhome DOT net>
From:	Alexandre Oliva <aoliva AT redhat DOT com>
Organization:	GCC Team, Red Hat
Date:	27 Jul 2000 19:12:20 -0300
In-Reply-To:	Laurynas Biveinis's message of "Thu, 27 Jul 2000 22:02:28 +0200"
Message-ID:	<or66prussb.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Lines:	21
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Jul 27, 2000, Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net> wrote:

> Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>> > in bootstrap stage2 compiling toplev.c it takes down GC time
>> Seems to me it would be a lot simpler to conditionally add vmalloc to
>> libiberty.  vmalloc isn't more than a half dozen lines of code.

> That's right; later I've contacted Alexandre Oliva because he
> had such a patch. I made his code work under DJGPP and sent him
> back. Alexandre, what's the state of that code?

I've hardly looked at it so far :-(

Maybe you should post it here and let others comment on it? (assuming
you haven't yet; I don't recall whether you'd Cc:ed the list)

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

- Raw text -