From:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:33:52 -0400
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: mkdoc patch
Message-ID:	<3965A400.30853.4EF07@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<200007070843.LAA07534@alpha.netvision.net.il>
References:	<200007070736 DOT JAA12848 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> (message from Martin Stromberg on Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:36:02 +0200 (MET DST))
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> I agree that it's a good idea.  However, one of these two should be
> called ANSI.  Or maybe even ANSI(C89) and ANSI(C99).  Otherwise we

Why not be internationally corect and call it 'ISO C'?

Mark

- Raw text -