Message-ID:	<393BB137.9EA960C4@softhome.net>
Date:	Mon, 05 Jun 2000 16:55:03 +0300
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: ANSI C and stdio.h
References:	<3937DEA9 DOT 63606B27 AT softhome DOT net> <200006021918 DOT PAA03693 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3938C1DE DOT E005BBA9 AT softhome DOT net> <200006030953 DOT MAA01306 AT alpha DOT netvision DOT net DOT il> <39394EC9 DOT 91B87484 AT softhome DOT net> <393AA7CF DOT 51E1DE11 AT softhome DOT net> <200006042012 DOT QAA08975 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <393B7081 DOT DBD8EC8B AT softhome DOT net> <200006051256 DOT IAA25791 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > Will the requirement to include stdarg.h in order to use vprintf()
> > count as problem?
> 
> If previous versions of djgpp didn't require it, that's a problem.

The fact that previous versions didn't require it does not say if
it is good or bad thing.

> > IMHO there already is a problem - we encourage users to write
> > unportable code.
> 
> No, we *allow* it, we don't *encourage* it.  I don't want to

I agree, 'allow'.

> gratuitously break existing code if we don't have to.

And what would mean that 'we have to'?

Laurynas

- Raw text -