Date:	Tue, 9 May 2000 11:53:10 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, lauras AT softhome DOT net
Subject:	Re: Perfomance of gc-simple
In-Reply-To:	<200005081630.MAA18562@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000509115251.946E-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 8 May 2000, DJ Delorie wrote:

> Note that ggc-page also uses /dev/zero, which djgpp doesn't have.

This should be easy to provide via an FSEXT.  If the code is private
to GCC sources, none of the complications with using FSEXT in the
library apply.

> Or, it needs to be able to map anonymous pages, which may also be
> hard with DJGPP.

Does that "Or" mean that if /dev/zero is available, mapping anonymous
pages is not required?  Or does gcc-page require mapping in any case?

- Raw text -