Date:	Fri, 28 Apr 2000 18:16:20 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id:	<200004282216.SAA26951@indy.delorie.com>
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT delorie DOT com>
To:	Pierre Muller <muller AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<200004281635.SAA21811@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr> (message from Pierre
	Muller on Fri, 28 Apr 2000 18:21:41 +0200)
Subject:	Re: interrupt 0x75 limitation in Win95 ?
References:	<200004271332 DOT PAA01783 AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
	<3907023C DOT 30855 DOT 3E86E3 AT localhost>
	<200004271332 DOT PAA01783 AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr> <200004281635 DOT SAA21811 AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 18:21:41 +0200
> From: Pierre Muller <muller AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
>
> >Sorry, I don't understand what does this mean: ``exception seems to be
> >sent to redir''.
> 
>   If I recompile redir.c but remove the djgpp_exception_toggle
> around the run_program call then
> the redir program gets the following !
> 
> 
> Exiting due to signal SIGFPE
> Floating Point exception at eip=0000e816, x87 status=0000

Well, why did you need to remove djgpp_exception_toggle?  It's there
on purpose, precisely to avoid these crashes, and so are the calls to
_clear87 and _fpreset.

Does it work okay with djgpp_exception_toggle in place?  If not, what
happens if you do not remove djgpp_exception_toggle?

- Raw text -