Message-ID:	<38315ADF.FC781206@softhome.net>
Date:	Tue, 16 Nov 1999 15:23:43 +0200
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	lt,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Michel de Ruiter <Michel AT smr DOT nl>
CC:	"'djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com'" <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>,
	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject:	Re: First alpha symlink patch
References:	<B0FEA00E82A7D1118BFB00A0CC99027821341A AT ARGON>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Michel de Ruiter wrote:
> Are you sure this difference is not because of a different configuration
> of Bash? IIRC, Bash has an option to change its behaviour regarding
> this. From a (probably old) Bash Info-file:

I haven't thought about this possibility because Midnight Commander
follows symlinks in the same way as bash does, that's why I've thought 
that it's up to libc... Anyway, I compiled & run small test program 
under Linux to see if really, and I have to confirm this.

> Maybe we should leave this option to Bash, not libc.

I'll leave - cancel my changes.

Laurynas Biveinis

- Raw text -