Date:	Mon, 2 Aug 1999 10:30:01 -0400
Message-Id:	<199908021430.KAA01030@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990801114824.20304X-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Sun, 1 Aug 1999 11:49:06 +0300 (IDT))
Subject:	Re: sscanf() format %p seems to be broken
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990801114824 DOT 20304X-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> DJ, is it a good idea to have %p imply the base of 16 in doscan.c?

The only rule is that what printf prints for %p is what scanf should
expect for %p.  It could be in pig-latin as long as it worked.
Borland, for example, prints 0000:0000 in some models.

- Raw text -