| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| From: | pavenis AT lanet DOT lv |
| Message-ID: | <B0000091877@stargate.astr.lu.lv> |
| To: | salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jun 1999 17:00:16 +0300 |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Subject: | Re: gcc-2.95 benchmark |
| In-reply-to: | <199906231532.LAA17753@delorie.com> |
| X-mailer: | Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11) |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On 23 Jun 99, at 10:24, salvador wrote: > Hi All: > > I tried the BYTE benchmarks with gcc 2.95 (june snapshot), even when it > isn't much better than other versions is overall the best for both Pentium > and K6 processors. > > The results are available in: > > http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/compila.html Some more thoughts: When building earlier versions (egcs-1.1.X) of egcs I enabled HAIFA scheduler (--enable-haifa when running configure). For building current snapshots of gcc-2.95 prerelease for DJGPP I didn't enable it. This can give small changes in performance at least it was so with egcs-1.1.X but I don't know how it will be with gcc-2.95 as I haven't tried. Perhaps it would be worth to try also snapshot built with configured with --enable-haifa Andris
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |