Date:	Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:03:10 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
cc:	"pavenis AT lanet DOT lv" <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc-2.95 benchmark
In-Reply-To:	<199906231532.LAA17753@delorie.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990624120221.25071H-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, salvador wrote:

>   I tried the BYTE benchmarks with gcc 2.95 (june snapshot), even when it
> isn't much better than other versions is overall the best for both Pentium
> and K6 processors.

Did anybody try to change the default section alignment in Binutils to
8 bytes, and see if that improves performance?

- Raw text -