Date:	Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:19:13 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
cc:	Erik Berglund <erik2 DOT berglund AT telia DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Re: gcc-crash - and a possible solution
In-Reply-To:	<B0000090800@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990617101846.22717F-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 16 Jun 1999 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:

> I'm afraid it would be rather difficult to get identical binaries.  
> Therefore I think we should in future either leave binaries not 
> stripped or put not stripped binaries somewhere.

I agree.  Having unstripped binaries somewhere they can be downloaded
if needed seems to be a better idea than including unstripped programs
in the usual *b.zip distributions, since the debug info bloats the
programs too much, and such crashes are usually rare to justify that
bloat.

- Raw text -