| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Mon, 31 May 1999 11:43:00 +0300 (IDT) |
| From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
| To: | Bill Currie <bill AT taniwha DOT tssc DOT co DOT nz> |
| cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com> |
| Subject: | Re: gcc 3.0 |
| In-Reply-To: | <3752415C.3645C239@taniwha.tssc.co.nz> |
| Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.990531114017.19086C-100000@is> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Mon, 31 May 1999, Bill Currie wrote: > I'm currently working on __attribute__((naked)) for *ALL* egcs ports. > This will produce functions that have *NO* entry or exit code (main code > only), not even a `ret', I believe. That's not exactly what I had in mind, as you probably understand. This attribute((naked)) seems to be for people who know what they are doing and want to avoid the overhead of the C function call. I meant quite the opposite: to relieve a naive user from the need to know assembly in simple interrupt-driven code.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |