Date:	Thu, 6 May 1999 10:09:28 -0400
Message-Id:	<199905061409.KAA12159@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
CC:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990506134042.15114D-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Thu, 6 May 1999 13:48:57 +0300 (IDT))
Subject:	Re: Signals' behavior
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990506134042 DOT 15114D-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

I'm reluctant to change signal handling just before a release, just to
please a spec.  Has anyone complained about how our signals are
handled?  If not, let's revisit this after the release.

- Raw text -