| www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Apr 1999 17:42:33 -0400 |
| Message-Id: | <199904212142.RAA19632@envy.delorie.com> |
| From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| In-reply-to: | <199904212044.UAA63562@out1.ibm.net> (snowball3@usa.net) |
| Subject: | Re: implementation of fsext for dup2? |
| References: | <199904212044 DOT UAA63562 AT out1 DOT ibm DOT net> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> I was looking at fsext.txh in src/libc/fsext and read about > __FSEXT_dup2. It says it's for handling dup2, yet dup2.c in CVS has > no code for calling a f.s.e. handler in it. I did a search for > __FSEXT_dup2 and the only references to it are in fsext.txh and > fsext.h. We had a bunch of submissions to extend fsext, but never quite resolved some of the issues. > Is f.s.e. for dup2 implemented or should the docs be changed to say > this feature isn't implemented yet? Probably should document them as currently unimplemented.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |