Message-ID:	<B0000082773@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
From:	"Andris Pavenis" <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Date:	Fri, 9 Apr 1999 15:25:09 +0300
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: LFN=y and MS-RAMDRIVE
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<199904091147.NAA23997@father.ludd.luth.se>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.02b14)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 9 Apr 99, at 13:47, Martin Str|mberg wrote:

> You said:
> > At least it is no so for Win95 OSR2. With MS RAMDRIVE.SYS I'm getting
> > output 1 from the same test and I haven't saw any LFN related problems with it.
> > So perhaps it's Win98 related problem.
> 
> I can't believe this! They (RAMDRIVE.SYS) are identical according diff.
> 
> May I ask you how your CONFIG.SYS line that installs the RAMDRIVE
> looks like? And what version it report on start-up?

device=c:\windows\ramdrive.sys 4096 512 256 /e

Maybe setting sector length to 512bytes is significant

> This is my line in my CONFIG.SYS:
> devicehigh=c:\windows\ramdrive.sys 16384 /e
> 
> And it reports "version 3.06" on start-up.

Browsing contents of ramdrive.sys shows version 3.06. (simply I didn't want to 
reboot to see it)

> 
> This is the size of C:\WINDOWS\RAMDRIVE.SYS (according to properties):
> 12 663 bytes
> 

The same

Andris

- Raw text -