Message-Id:	<199901201549.PAA139430@out4.ibm.net>
From:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT usa DOT net>
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 1999 10:50:18 -0500
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: bash 2.02.1 alpha port available
References:	<199901200247 DOT CAA92830 AT out4 DOT ibm DOT net>
In-reply-to:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.990120091800.2569M-100000@is>
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> A common mistake is to forget that Bash (and any other Unix shell)
> don't consider the current directory to be implicitly prepended to
> PATH, and fail to say `./ding.bat' instead of `ding.bat'.  Is this the
> case, maybe?
> 

Yep, you're right. It wasn't a behavior I was expecting, and it also 
explains why I see a lot of './someprogram' in scripts.

Mark

--- 
Mark Elbrecht snowball3 AT usa DOT net
http://members.xoom.com/snowball3/

- Raw text -