Date:	Fri, 20 Jun 1997 09:01:29 -0700
From:	Bill Currie <billc AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz>
Subject:	Re: Possible misbehavior of write
To:	Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Cc:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Reply-to:	billc AT blackmagic DOT tait DOT co DOT nz
Message-id:	<33AAA959.189C@blackmagic.tait.co.nz>
Organization:	Tait Electronics NZ
MIME-version:	1.0
References:	<9706191558 DOT AA14263 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>

Charles Sandmann wrote:
> 
> Other possibilities
> #define _djbadptr(ptr) 0
> #define _djbadptr(ptr) ((ptr < 0x10a8) || ptr > sbrk(0))
> extern int _djbadptr();

All of the above, depending on a define?  That way the programmer has
control over the level of `protection'.  The first one for production
release, the second and third for varouse levels of paranoia during
developement.

I take it `extern int _djbadptr();' is meant to do all the sophisticated
checking Charles proposed earlier.

The only hastle I can see is the need to distribute multiple libraries
or answere a lot of question relating to code size/how to get debug code
etc.

Bill
-- 
Leave others their otherness.

- Raw text -