X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
	h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=l1u4b/bQAJhTly044jJKUvblBT8lHy9TId7LRDkHEjk=;
	b=EfLAoDuWkCoFE61jZpwYvZn48kRm9ByHu9UhXH9Vcx9mqYhEtOaf2acvTe12uZDLrg
	J+mZCWzRhnFPOetn+J/v3hBg5wjQKA9U518Zxv6QdW7WykZJJ5jbkRnHV1biBHL2mzyj
	8RX7O+FvHbUTuIqoHtV25fmteUJgJn2lI1DWTjdbFuDf5IOH52RvlyxvZ17NHvEiL+/V
	gH65Z2MYf7Kx0v1tQR63rKN/Er6gsbqkthLcyqQZDZatS9IjH7V+F6x8fx2NILPtwJ2i
	1GwEXYf7vC2l42fk3ReBP6dNHAqFesI3JWVxZZ69CnMd+6MtrstYjrP5AssNCho+Y9Vp
	O8TA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
	h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=l1u4b/bQAJhTly044jJKUvblBT8lHy9TId7LRDkHEjk=;
	b=PCI4LpQziT1c6MVaF73y85AcEZMwbktlLpfkYT9GXFoseuclbptXw/LooenxXSPIzw
	R2GR/G6CZuj3fkPzJFE1MIoOBaVbeeoUdR1fu24k0i8krAY+nVWJmjeymRESd6pD8JxP
	Er50iQordf+VHAD01dixSSmsE+uiWm3teOsCaoHHNYL6CJbOUyvYEp7Omzqdx5OCKRE8
	IfCjCI7G6xI5k+F+p3DHMhfbDV+dkJ1wOMdyRnCUYv96mz+mGtCpEKQ4PkNbWrXLqCRD
	Vdz2kmy84ZtzirMQwPqMXmYm5z0GE/UqDhXqLkWkq/TMAOXX3lt2hfDGgXRhTAIdYojs
	lvPA==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AFqh2kqrHFiS8Pd2x8fzz9IZhdZgbtBie/GCtyRHDUAcmJCBzfEgHTsu
	F57yVwmXpOOaSrZ0dlbeB2IjFSzmpPyUf4s4we0UlspP
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AMrXdXv72AFUKMSsAFl9Q6Me6hVutbdScM1cc7MOKuyb8H4vf18cBQneMmgg/a5+1qfrK+w5EagngmJjPw7fHQzqkhE=
X-Received:	by 2002:a05:600c:1d25:b0:3da:fa8a:8511 with SMTP id
	l37-20020a05600c1d2500b003dafa8a8511mr2909657wms.185.1675088225530; Mon, 30
	Jan 2023 06:17:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<83o7qg5hah.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<d67303fd-c302-82cc-bb0d-d1a21640d66f AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vDYkF13NYPP_EXGMwzrjhLj2vEq68+-uYPfZOXpqWVRfQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83r0vd78cu DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vCCYsgtbQ5wsgbS3S4G7N+H5zi5DxCyVZLSkEKrSpifMw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83o7qh74td DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vDT10ZGfa3Mi2x0syvoT44Q3nfgcMfOwMZF=dM+ruL5OA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<b73813c5-0b91-6fa4-e4d2-55ddd97955a0 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vD5O16WsdfW9JqaDevTa2yqypD05fRFG+pW4T=3fq9SjA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83o7qg5hah DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
From:	"Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jan 2023 17:17:04 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vCFR6pAv9pWurZRcnhy-ok1rp_c08m4TN5UJJd9dx1qEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH v3] dxe3gen: invoke ld/as via gcc
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 1/30/23, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]
<djgpp AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

>> The only downside to your patch is that older gcc versions have a
>> problem handling -T on their command line, which is why I had gone
>> back.  I don't have a solution for that, buit I honestly haven't
>> tried very much.
>>
>> Eli, DJ: What do you guys think?
>
> How serious is the issue with the linker script?  Is that a problem
> only for GCC 2.95?

As I had said, I only tested with gcc-3.4.6 (cross- under i686-linux)
and 2.95 (native under dosbox).  Gcc versions 4.x and newer _should_
be OK. Don't know how gcc 3.0.x, 3.1.x, 3.2.x, and 3.3.x behave.

EDIT: I now tested 3.3.6 and 8.2.0, both cross- under i686-linux, and
they both work OK with JW's patch.  I now do not know the behavior of
only gcc 3.0.x, 3.1.x and 3.2.x, and possibly they are not worth much
to worry about.

>  If so, I'm okay with using GCC and documenting
> that 2.95 is no longer supported for this purpose.

OK then, no objections from me. Feel free to apply the patch.

- Raw text -