X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
	h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=Asjvv9TNZof+vvTYJIfPLwNq4Vu/C9MPjMW9vHZlqnw=;
	b=TKCdJy6reF5GvVKwl1ppCJiymKgTfImwgbxTL074feeCD3/kpthGjzAfe4ka+gc/E2
	kF9M0NS0jMXdELZ3sqg6tm4sy0R082mQVqx+UjeM+7yIN+lIPGtNgMuLRr7mVECPZlxA
	aVwm8wQANy7ChUFxnb12n/ILDtrzbulVeXoS9pAleRRvOCqDP5Qgtzscz2+St2cndQQe
	c+S/rf4rEr+jtfo7/XWiDxo4dxeeUpLS+Jpx+M6c+yXd3A2raz/Gv/asTuMb0MfvQsUZ
	/irzziw65WIcyiAI8vNObxHXX1P7J9sGNUGA+1qyiQMYg7V9HkRx9grKhq55KMh8wxFN
	3mdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
	h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=Asjvv9TNZof+vvTYJIfPLwNq4Vu/C9MPjMW9vHZlqnw=;
	b=lGmFTzvMNBAf9+Z1zei9plNPldr8wciP2QiF34WURJXvmDMXY9gQNdK9P+ao26HcQ6
	ZKlAIheGji6IkfBcljJlPD7HkDh09HK/ESa7I8cpQj1aBLAuqs38QBA08Rk75uzJZg/k
	AGlPypuRoT2yKkY7RENRJYMXR5xNVRR5vC40NaI4wF5CBJZWrU15Bg8wMnvQNGy16olb
	Ik9Wp5Q2PNg8bFChhBxiqz9mcAj1YSZ/A/SQAU8i5yzbu57umGGlcgG4uHua1x/lWr7Y
	BVMcP10JMHbKqavPdht2pgP3suGCCQt+h8fIx/TmyCzRjeUdOa2Zme7oY3PjGWWWjSs/
	V7TQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AFqh2kpsZb9n9nnnORaEAdzzwLaYxcYVlly2nSl5A7Tpy+9LDWnooYbf
	5vaWFd6+F9QZijXHNmkrI9d8vn2PbpFZVR2BaxQsRpqj
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AMrXdXuQJPUJcxFXn8POZdRPQqHgBojuuQUsY+gw9iS9UFcNjdkmuCswawHFWUoSjvX30DrJUce68KqONLYAG4yaiKQ=
X-Received:	by 2002:a5d:5185:0:b0:2bd:d222:68b3 with SMTP id
	k5-20020a5d5185000000b002bdd22268b3mr944128wrv.95.1674911334048; Sat, 28 Jan
	2023 05:08:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<83lelmakwk.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<edefcfee-d1ce-415a-8d1d-525a660fb0d5n AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vCduRPA7Ky-kDqs=QtO-qi=DQczM6FMHhB+=Ltof54P=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<c934abb6-c11e-0087-cd32-365d25d3f154 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vCHMXDD8iewRStieHyTcgjGF3=d29LmMT53vrzGYe+zMQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CACuL_+CZm++qhEr7PedDmQaTxjZu9d-rVSw1bgPeist7XZ+dpQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vDPwv5G9DeFKyKFqt39cDDmO4LmDtbtMyoMdRR2xeEkow AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<3b8f674c-bca3-c679-952e-f8ba5af196e7 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vBptnTAy2TA-pj5JCbAUJMiXkAAoP_xYFZZJ99iB7v9mQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<500850be-fd64-3f82-a1e1-929903084e9b AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vA0zXX3Sb49WBzU5g1-8dmO5G5wrb3uT+tLRq2LB0wu5Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<3d9271ae-266d-ee7b-853b-984857ced1c8 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vD6sZpTicPh0xuJ16r76qBZ5BZro6x=9+=Z+P-0f_eRSA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<f04cd9db-fe76-219c-bacb-47711df559e2 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vCv_bpM+iinTcreMJD_gv34Rna3jLspiLFfESFuNxOtoA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<af7fa08a-b074-0a4c-5e2f-99299940e3cc AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vB22rof4HPV_dVPy4tVmsmeDMy4G4r2Vx-_YLwOW6C9ug AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<bbdf1853-5454-93b2-fcf9-2306c6949c86 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vBDi8gwhVVacnhnP+eufCkMNK4DancpOjnD7ScOWCEF6g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83sffvbux1 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vAuq+O2gRRM--E0YAPy6D1pLgcP2r0-4+sCLis=kwGYzA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83mt63azwi DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vByQZVnfkF_0UX+4p+rcm8uTehwSnM9hSHW-m=Dc4HBtw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<835ycravjo DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vCauV7VviJ2L+us_4KOgH8TYgEkVtn17hyBxDH5YuddRA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83zga39fil DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vCPF_OJkxGxqhQNue0K4j0WQ302GdYSncQydM_EN2kjuA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83v8kr9bye DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vCWL4XJaXstSouW5uUdQt2nyX6jTGxBH+Z6cX+=Te4F5Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83lelmakwk DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
From:	"Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 28 Jan 2023 16:08:52 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vBGAd9mET8PH8wSL1dgoARKSEKMyYa7Whc0iWky2BaZ3A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: DXE3 with std::vector
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

>>> Note that additional "-Tdjgpp-x.djl" at the end which screws up
>>> everything.
>>>
>>> What if you use both -T and -Xlinker -T?  IOW, pass -T both to GCC and
>>> to the linker directly?
>>
>> That works with gcc-3.4.6, but not with gcc-2.95: adding -v to command
>> line shows that gcc295 invokes ld with -Tdjgpp.djl -T dxe.ld
>>
>>> If this still doesn't work, can you show the output of "gcc -dumpspecs"
>>> from GCC 2.95?
>>
>> Attached as 295SPECS.TXT  [EDIT: really attached it this time.]
>
> OK, I see the problem now.  So this means people who use GCC 2.95 will
> have to use the previous version of dxe3gen.  In that case, I think
> I'm okay with documenting this and ignoring the problem with GCC 2.95.

I still don't know what other gcc versions would have an issue
with the new version, e.g. gcc 3.0, 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3: I only tested
with 3.4, so I am not 100% comfortable with the patch being in.
(Also see down below.)

>>>>> OK, but still: there should be no problem with having both on the
>>>>> command line, right?
>>>>
>>>> No, no problems. But detecting and correctly using -lgcc was the
>>>> original goal.
>>>
>>> But -L doesn't contradict that goal, does it?
>>
>> I'm trying to understand your question and how you see things:
>> What I'm saying is, needing to add an additional -L/some/path for
>> -lgcc is really counter-intuitive and unexpected. I guess someone
>> has to run gcc -print-libgcc-file-name to manually detect it and
>> than add it to his own command line.
>
> Sure, but we are already talking about someone who does something very
> non-standard.

For the record, -lgcc is not non-standart,

>  I just prefer that we leave those hypothetical people a
> way of keeping their setups, whatever they are, and I think supporting
> DJDIR and DXE_LD_LIBRARY_PATH for adding -L options to the command
> line cannot do any harm to people who use the standard directories,
> right?

Was the discussion in this section only about DXE_LD_LIBRARY_PATH and/
or DJDIR support? (I knew we were speaking about different things :)
No, I am not against restoring DXE_LD_LIBRARY_PATH and/or DJDIR env
vars recognition.

BTW, if I revert the patch and go back to the previous version, -lgcc
problem can be easily worked around when using a makefile, like:
LIBGCCDIR = $(dir $(shell $(CC) -print-libgcc-file-name))
my.dxe:
	dxe3gen -o my.dxe -E _sym -U $(OBJS) -L$(LIBGCCDIR) -lgcc

I even created a documentation patch to dxegen.txi for it. Should we
really keep the patch in, or revert it?

- Raw text -