X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
	h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=iYxj+maXzY6wRsuwiPjQctZluKe6I5o7ZD5h/uRm+WQ=;
	b=FPrllF4TqTrJQ7mFECjZRwxk7Wil3P0ZbZ/6heJENqmaQb5HL1ZCJ16YHPySqpUS3Q
	TCdrMMP4H2Lqb59OMxOPS/sMokXQSD2x4cOrMsEVScA1w/qpLwdMq3Ij3AgeY7I5Os9M
	ji/A9jgmolQb3iaQVxGfgXHU0FaHSVEtHmMs9FZaTbV1MV4B0RXtvXkWEiX3AXYF5iNa
	VqO/krFEtn99Hu/U6QzhSuRyMDgWVNM65wIYmTnmeizJ3lehZd1le8f/48Xfd367QRyL
	S1SHqSGNuLGwmQAb+g8wgFnmTsUs31ylRQ6UOMKqJNPY4cqM16TI93cwDODB9ekzehR+
	ozqA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
	h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
	bh=iYxj+maXzY6wRsuwiPjQctZluKe6I5o7ZD5h/uRm+WQ=;
	b=UWMBFM21aUlq+YQJdhw+IUso1SUyDLWTrCebj9KuzCgMrJ3cvfcdZRFaZGHoZ+eps4
	W03yG1G3iOikd6hd5GYfY7jkz1PRhfAQGaxlJJ0g8nCug5mBKuUrHtCRUkyC28O/rlTi
	OrUggTQ7o8icSEW33Fil3AjZJ6HIe1ySGV+pkhhyelvEKY9amfVTMpgYTLqcbwRhmXb6
	g2HjvNxgg331R6T4c7Fk4WxILnm22xsjyfogy4upJ1yydyCHHE7vBOddS6QsdGZa84ck
	XJUtFK47T+Ra0P3+8KWVg4loGLaCXDLN2lK20rPTsZeYIBcyibRlm+Mo9/xCUqhj2U91
	G/7A==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AFqh2kq9n4SyCjZ5YMLcIoWrqkhPCp+aZ0MnhCa2TKgkBhv7ulnMUefQ
	GIQRftR9WRycM5sTRl22X5NtV6jelSjdtgXx9+XKmIzP
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AMrXdXsNSJqfJpzSAKQuAwkwJwQwdsbAl4wsfcVuasUBiOSnZMMj6RQDHUU4pCdUJGB/NLif4ad69WQwELQO1OkAeSc=
X-Received:	by 2002:a5d:5185:0:b0:2bd:d222:68b3 with SMTP id
	k5-20020a5d5185000000b002bdd22268b3mr940646wrv.95.1674905298512; Sat, 28 Jan
	2023 03:28:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<83v8kr9bye.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<edefcfee-d1ce-415a-8d1d-525a660fb0d5n AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vCduRPA7Ky-kDqs=QtO-qi=DQczM6FMHhB+=Ltof54P=Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<c934abb6-c11e-0087-cd32-365d25d3f154 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vCHMXDD8iewRStieHyTcgjGF3=d29LmMT53vrzGYe+zMQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CACuL_+CZm++qhEr7PedDmQaTxjZu9d-rVSw1bgPeist7XZ+dpQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAA2C=vDPwv5G9DeFKyKFqt39cDDmO4LmDtbtMyoMdRR2xeEkow AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<3b8f674c-bca3-c679-952e-f8ba5af196e7 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vBptnTAy2TA-pj5JCbAUJMiXkAAoP_xYFZZJ99iB7v9mQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<500850be-fd64-3f82-a1e1-929903084e9b AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vA0zXX3Sb49WBzU5g1-8dmO5G5wrb3uT+tLRq2LB0wu5Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<3d9271ae-266d-ee7b-853b-984857ced1c8 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vD6sZpTicPh0xuJ16r76qBZ5BZro6x=9+=Z+P-0f_eRSA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<f04cd9db-fe76-219c-bacb-47711df559e2 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vCv_bpM+iinTcreMJD_gv34Rna3jLspiLFfESFuNxOtoA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<af7fa08a-b074-0a4c-5e2f-99299940e3cc AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vB22rof4HPV_dVPy4tVmsmeDMy4G4r2Vx-_YLwOW6C9ug AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<bbdf1853-5454-93b2-fcf9-2306c6949c86 AT gmail DOT com> <CAA2C=vBDi8gwhVVacnhnP+eufCkMNK4DancpOjnD7ScOWCEF6g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83sffvbux1 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vAuq+O2gRRM--E0YAPy6D1pLgcP2r0-4+sCLis=kwGYzA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83mt63azwi DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vByQZVnfkF_0UX+4p+rcm8uTehwSnM9hSHW-m=Dc4HBtw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<835ycravjo DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vCauV7VviJ2L+us_4KOgH8TYgEkVtn17hyBxDH5YuddRA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83zga39fil DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <CAA2C=vCPF_OJkxGxqhQNue0K4j0WQ302GdYSncQydM_EN2kjuA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<83v8kr9bye DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
From:	"Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 28 Jan 2023 14:28:17 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vDXnh6x+YNkg1HjHs68V7Ncu2b+x8Q-20=FKkTTKyMqmw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: DXE3 with std::vector
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

>> Note that additional "-Tdjgpp-x.djl" at the end which screws up everything.
>
> What if you use both -T and -Xlinker -T?  IOW, pass -T both to GCC and
> to the linker directly?

That works with gcc-3.4.6, but not with gcc-2.95: adding -v to command line
shows that gcc295 invokes ld with -Tdjgpp.djl -T dxe.ld

> If this still doesn't work, can you show the output of "gcc -dumpspecs"
> from GCC 2.95?

Attached as 295SPECS.TXT

>>> OK, but still: there should be no problem with having both on the
>>> command line, right?
>>
>> No, no problems. But detecting and correctly using -lgcc was the
>> original goal.
>
> But -L doesn't contradict that goal, does it?

I'm trying to understand your question and how you see things:
What I'm saying is, needing to add an additional -L/some/path for
-lgcc is really counter-intuitive and unexpected. I guess someone
has to run gcc -print-libgcc-file-name to manually detect it and
than add it to his own command line.

>> Looks like this is becoming a hassle. Revert the patch and document
>> the -lgcc issue instead?  (Even though I did like the result of the
>> patch where it does run..)
>
> I'm sorry I'm causing the hassle,

No, you really are not.

> but can we please not give up just
> yet, and see if we can have the cake and eat it, too?

OK :)

- Raw text -