www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Checker-Version: | SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org |
X-Spam-Level: | |
X-Spam-Status: | No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD |
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 | |
Date: | Sat, 07 Oct 2017 10:44:27 +0300 |
Message-Id: | <834lrbv1us.fsf@gnu.org> |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <or9k8d$b7j$2@gioia.aioe.org> (message from Rod Pemberton on Sat, |
7 Oct 2017 00:14:17 -0400) | |
Subject: | Re: DOSBox? |
References: | <or6bl4$pdo$1 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org> |
<xnshexxjpr DOT fsf AT delorie DOT com> | |
<or7gpa$jti$1 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org> | |
<59d767c6$0$9406$426a74cc AT news DOT free DOT fr> <or9k8d$b7j$2 AT gioia DOT aioe DOT org> | |
X-detected-operating-system: | by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] |
X-Received-From: | 2001:4830:134:3::e |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: Rod Pemberton <EmailNullFile AT voenflacbe DOT cpm> > Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 00:14:17 -0400 > > At least, I'm not being hostile, inciting unnecessary arguments, > responding off-topic, spamming the group, nor lying, as Dj did. :) Actually, you are all of those. > Where did I tell the OP something in a "harsh" way? Once again: it was the "lying" part. > The question is why did you take it to be harsh? Because every reasonable person would. Disagreement is not a lie, not even close. > So, why don't you ask Dj to stop initiating such divisive conflict? > I simply informed the OP of the truth of the matter. Dj wrongly > took offense to that and incited an argument. You may wish to re-read the thread to see what actually happened. This sub-thread was started by _your_ message, not DJ's. DJ didn't take any offense (originally, until you called him a liar), he just corrected your incorrect statement of the rules in this forum. Which was a reasonable thing to do, since someone who reads this forum could have concluded incorrectly that top-posting here will cause some kind of shaming of the poster.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |