X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received:	by 10.107.135.140 with SMTP id r12mr39549600ioi.19.1469904685857;
	Sat, 30 Jul 2016 11:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received:	by 10.157.29.72 with SMTP id m66mr3108001otm.20.1469904685812;
	Sat, 30 Jul 2016 11:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date:	Sat, 30 Jul 2016 11:51:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<761aff8d-eb27-fcae-5486-28fdf878d2fd@iki.fi>
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=104.55.20.34; posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO
NNTP-Posting-Host:	104.55.20.34
References:	<761aff8d-eb27-fcae-5486-28fdf878d2fd AT iki DOT fi>
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<dc5085ec-7a16-4a97-bd28-0eded3afcd63@googlegroups.com>
Subject:	Re: About different programming language support for DJGPP port of GCC
From:	"rugxulo AT gmail DOT com [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date:	Sat, 30 Jul 2016 18:51:25 +0000
Bytes:	2314
Lines:	30
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Saturday, July 30, 2016 at 6:21:20 AM UTC-5, Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT spam DOT sux) [via djgpp AT spam DOT sux] wrote:
>
> Sent patches for DJGPP support to GCC Ada compiler:
> 
> Got an answer https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg02009.html ,
> which raises correct question: how many people are actually using DJGPP
> port of Ada compiler?

I hate arguments like this. It's a self-defeating question, setting up
an impossible impasse.

Is this really adding much to the maintenance burden? I doubt it, esp.
considering the overall complexity of Ada2012 and modern OSes.

> I myself do not belong to that list.

Me neither (yet), no huge plans.
 
> I guess one should tell on list if he/she is actually using it
> for something real.

Only rebuilding Engine 3D. Although Gautier did mirror it to SF.net
without my prodding, even there it's considered "inactive/abandoned".
 
> Perhaps one should also ask the same question also about ports of
> Fortran, Objective-C and Objective-C++ compilers.

Nope. Last I checked, ObjC didn't even work anymore (since 4.6.x?), but
I don't grok that either, just bored/curious.

- Raw text -