X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received:	by 10.66.138.43 with SMTP id qn11mr20761502pab.8.1439237782378;
	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received:	by 10.140.101.129 with SMTP id u1mr53933qge.27.1439237782078; Mon,
	10 Aug 2015 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date:	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<mpob96$vvo$1@usenet.news.interia.pl>
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2.165.62.59; posting-account=v5xbdQoAAAAOGc9Ccc-kLZyobvPlN3Qr
NNTP-Posting-Host:	2.165.62.59
References:	<2af8c3c0-bc09-4de9-abe4-cfd6c947425a AT googlegroups DOT com> <mpob96$vvo$1 AT usenet DOT news DOT interia DOT pl>
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<422e9328-994e-4485-95d3-2f0911cc6f74@googlegroups.com>
Subject:	Re: Keep 2.05 archives separate?
From:	"Georg Potthast (dosusb AT googlemail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date:	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:16:22 +0000
Bytes:	1303
Lines:	0
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

I wonder, do the experts think this is a bad idea? The wish that the djgpp users expressed here did not receive any response.

- Raw text -