X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received:	by 10.70.140.108 with SMTP id rf12mr18520032pdb.12.1434120934443;
	Fri, 12 Jun 2015 07:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received:	by 10.140.81.149 with SMTP id f21mr10514qgd.8.1434120934340; Fri,
	12 Jun 2015 07:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date:	Fri, 12 Jun 2015 07:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<83r3phqbhd.fsf@gnu.org>
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246;
	posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO
NNTP-Posting-Host:	65.13.115.246
References:	<201506091712 DOT t59HCPci004068 AT delorie DOT com> <557739E0 DOT 6070608 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAB9Rao93XrKFBpUDnZdjCz+rEXHGOU2RNKdou2oMLJOk802LnA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55775E64 DOT 2090901 AT gmail DOT com> <CAB9Rao-Njdr-CB=vqHnb+TVDmXu3eXqsB5CHB7V0kDwBEsM-WQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<5579ED42 DOT 6070309 AT gmail DOT com> <bedfae3f-2695-4253-8d9c-11c55703f8b5 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<83616ts7gt DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <510f0bc7-7911-4d22-bfca-48716371ecb5 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<83r3phqbhd DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<25c85ed7-5927-45fb-afa4-6d13200beebd@googlegroups.com>
Subject:	Re: DJGGP 2.05 upgrade problems.
From:	"rugxulo AT gmail DOT com" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date:	Fri, 12 Jun 2015 14:55:34 +0000
Bytes:	2481
Lines:	27
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 8:53:50 AM UTC-5, Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT hates DOT spam) wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 05:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: "rugxulo AT hates DOT spam" <djgpp AT hates DOT spam>
> >
> > Anyways, at the very least, such things (Find or File+Txt+Shl)
> > should probably be recompiled with 2.05 *before* trying to debug
> > anything.
> 
> I thought he already did.  Apologies if I misunderstood.

I have no idea. In fact, I don't even know if that was a priority.
I'm just saying, since you guys keep heavily emphasizing 2.05 here
(with which I have no problem with), it seems like a "no brainer"
to recompile crucial pieces first (before reporting any old bugs
that may have already been fixed).

/beta/v2gnu/ (on ftp.delorie.com) :

fnd4233br4.zip     6/27/2008

fil41b.zip        10/12/2014
txt20b.zip        10/12/2014
shl2011b.zip      10/12/2014

Of course, I've still got the old 2003 versions. So even I can
hardly keep up these days.   :-P

- Raw text -