X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=C6XSCJZ0qgHkPXW2/l952I1DUD190+owzZAiuGnDjGQ=;
	b=pU3NnvjANV64RBZczVZoIwkY37M0RdF8rYeF2uW8fObDSAb1hM+FEWbWSsD47O3Yrc
	w7Kv8e2B5uY/A6LHQOAQfxrDjCZp7LRc2Ee51WJyAFukZBXWMiTC5s8a7wpNIbcasTXW
	B9fmh8m8tOkXsCbwh79PVP84LglWHtOgqYHlUYBkLtAa6ICL8nJrbVjtBLcQPvMGYe0m
	CzBDU6fixqms3eIffbGiONm+4+YmvNDE3m0V6UDCs2RyqosA0KOA6os6LVNcow4xXsVm
	lsX7JrRGXcpmSz8FW5o1Zkcs5U9RpS7tiCmvgejOPczG1ykqSdvkVP1C19aDwE5pdIHP
	IEuQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.221.51.77 with SMTP id vh13mr1194299vcb.41.1402933927816;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 08:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<4605f672-7a3f-43a4-8261-d50ad583f336@googlegroups.com>
References:	<a121692e-95cf-4038-8cf2-9cfe19b3ff71 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<4605f672-7a3f-43a4-8261-d50ad583f336 AT googlegroups DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 08:52:07 -0700
Message-ID:	<CAB9Rao_9sGJ_w0h8xwg4YA62o+Dddn9Hy4b4AVhfQf8ZPAL6wg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: std::thread, please?
From:	Louis Santillan <lpsantil AT gmail DOT com>
To:	"djgpp AT delorie DOT com" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--001a113361546935b204fbf602da
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

For DOS, I would expect NetSurf to be a better target since most of its
dependencies are internal to the NetSurf project.  One major issue for most
website, however, would be the lack of JS.

http://www.netsurf-browser.org/


On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Georg Potthast <dosusb AT googlemail DOT com>
wrote:

> > this could enable a port of firefox to DOS like people have been
> wanting? modern browsers are multithreaded.
>
> Firefox depends also on Cairo and GTK2/3 among other libraries. I think
> porting Firefox to DOS is so much work that it is unrealistic to expect
> this to happen.
>
> Georg
>
>

--001a113361546935b204fbf602da
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">For DOS, I would expect NetSurf to be a better target sinc=
e most of its dependencies are internal to the NetSurf project. =C2=A0One m=
ajor issue for most website, however, would be the lack of JS.<div><br></di=
v><div>
<a href=3D"http://www.netsurf-browser.org/">http://www.netsurf-browser.org/=
</a><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_=
quote">On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Georg Potthast <span dir=3D"ltr">&l=
t;<a href=3D"mailto:dosusb AT googlemail DOT com" target=3D"_blank">dosusb AT googlem=
ail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">&gt; this could enable a port of firefox to =
DOS like people have been wanting? modern browsers are multithreaded.<br>
<br>
Firefox depends also on Cairo and GTK2/3 among other libraries. I think por=
ting Firefox to DOS is so much work that it is unrealistic to expect this t=
o happen.<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
Georg<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a113361546935b204fbf602da--

- Raw text -