X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date:	Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:19:03 +0100
From:	Mateusz Viste <mateusz DOT viste AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Watt32 crashing on i386
References:	<52a72357$0$3635$426a74cc AT news DOT free DOT fr> <7675e40e-7afe-4fc7-bb99-ba22ce94ded6 AT googlegroups DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<7675e40e-7afe-4fc7-bb99-ba22ce94ded6@googlegroups.com>
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<52a9f007$0$2218$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
Organization:	Guest of ProXad - France
NNTP-Posting-Date:	12 Dec 2013 18:19:03 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host:	82.225.72.113
X-Trace:	1386868743 news-4.free.fr 2218 82.225.72.113:52772
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT proxad DOT net
Bytes:	1691
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On 12/11/2013 05:55 PM, RayeR wrote:
> Somewhere I readed that recent GCC contains some bugs so it's unable to produce clean 386 code and may still contain some higher CPU opcode. Maybe older GCC 3.x would owrk better. But I'm not sure.
>

Hi RayeR, yes, I read about this, too, but iirc this was on some older 
gcc version, and since my program is working fine, and *only* crashing 
when calling watt32, I assumed it's not about non-clean 386 code.. 
(because then I imagine I'd have much more crashes than just in one 
single situtation).
But sure - testing with an older gcc (or even older djgpp) might be a 
good test anyway.

Mateusz

- Raw text -