www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Message-ID: | <529DD111.8050000@gmx.de> |
Date: | Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:39:45 +0100 |
From: | Juan Manuel Guerrero <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Question about different behavior of fclose/fread on plain dos |
and windows. | |
References: | <529D448A DOT 7050208 AT gmx DOT de> <831u1u5se3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> |
In-Reply-To: | <831u1u5se3.fsf@gnu.org> |
X-Provags-ID: | V03:K0:uSv7zjNj/cpEGpUdjXWcbVCMkcWmT/dGmo37kvC/k+ohL+diH+s |
WjsqX+/eFKUGvhmKNMIap7VCXuo2A2AnNkIsTUeOiFBcwNqjDPdesWG8V2ztoOY4UNV3h+t | |
hipQqN0xZDv24nRHVPzKbjoD0fA+X72DJyWAiCFLJl5NVJXHfC+Vk4hWVSxK+YiVkhrNMBO | |
GjIwRYxNLBP5Nzp5fr4Yw== | |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Am 03.12.2013 08:02, schrieb Eli Zaretskii: >> Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 03:40:10 +0100 >> From: Juan Manuel Guerrero <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de> >> >> The code shall open the same file for writing and reading. I have compiled >> the code on linux and on Win98SE, Win2K and WinXP. On windows I have used >> DJGPP 2.03 and DJGPP 2.04. In all these cases the code works as I expected. >> This means that reading after having closed the file shall result in a filled >> buf_r. The program gives the following output: >> >> fwrite(fw) OK (7): pipapo >> fread(fr) OK (0): >> fread(fr) OK (7): pipapo >> >> >> But if I compile the same code on plain DOS (MSDOS 6.22 or MSDOS 7.1) the program >> fails producing the following output: >> fwrite(fw) OK (7): pipapo >> fread(fr) OK (0): >> fread(fr) FO (0): >> >> >> (If you run the program twice on plain dos remove the produced file.txt before >> starting the program or the program will seem to work.) > Does it work reliably if you open the file for reading only after its > write handle is closed? How about if you call clearerr on the stream, > before the second read? It has no influence if I call clearerr. The flags that are cleared are not set before the call. It works reliably in all variants if I open the file for reading after having closed the write handle. Regards, Juan M. Guerrero
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |