X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received:	by 10.224.59.205 with SMTP id m13mr35002969qah.7.1369059662407;
	Mon, 20 May 2013 07:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received:	by 10.49.41.1 with SMTP id b1mr1519626qel.18.1369059662334; Mon,
	20 May 2013 07:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date:	Mon, 20 May 2013 07:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<Roidnc6h2rL7w-rMnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=90.181.199.10;
	posting-account=Q0wMHAoAAADjYrghh94FTf6YnbpTqZgp
NNTP-Posting-Host:	90.181.199.10
References:	<201304061704 DOT r36H4k48018021 AT delorie DOT com> <c46f36b4-f175-40b5-aeb9-2713a57fab95 AT googlegroups DOT com>
	<3728e704-b839-4ad6-998e-d3aab686b649 AT googlegroups DOT com> <Roidnc6h2rL7w-rMnZ2dnUVZ_t-dnZ2d AT earthlink DOT com>
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<12d60e38-9778-4463-b914-396c2a62273f@googlegroups.com>
Subject:	Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GNU binutils 2.23.2 - stack size
From:	RayeR <glaux AT centrum DOT cz>
Injection-Date:	Mon, 20 May 2013 14:21:02 +0000
Bytes:	1716
Lines:	4
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id r4KEj1nk014429
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Aha, so no way under DPMI 0.9 to implement classic grow-down stack? But you can allocate block of memory at specific address range (or not?) - near top of memory. Hm, you probably mean tthat this block cannot overlap heap area so there's fixed boundaries of this blocks... 
I know CWSDPMI support some functionality of DPMI 1.0 but not this?

- Raw text -