X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=xMZENXB11mRCsc7aiU3WPNiBX/PyQDRCsN7kS2DMA48=;
	b=vs7RpZq6QfmJpJcHOXQjsW6ecrLAwqYGQX4FS3Uj5tlSJz14a6CGfg4hhe06DX6XXd
	IFFs2N10rcbXwNVDbcD7DUKBCc5pp9sQvVuc4AFt2IFOz+TPqP2IaVPCDU3R3GFDFE5A
	yYENb5Rf/oyT14JKvzdZbjlZtK6O3m6jwA/J0=
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<66fec64a-4317-485b-8dae-7d8431e0cd48@x16g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
References:	<CAA2C=vDD8B4QnuuCCMGm1vYm4oE6EfErh8FcFH4OXzgVSBEFuA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<66fec64a-4317-485b-8dae-7d8431e0cd48 AT x16g2000yqg DOT googlegroups DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Jul 2011 08:54:58 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vAzMK6xaUDh+eYFn4wb4axX5haPCC2BqMsZXt-80tsmJA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: vsnprintf with djgpp <= 2.03
From:	Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz AT gmail DOT com>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id p666HD2o012503
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Jul 5, 12:46 pm, Ozkan Sezer <seze DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> For vsnprintf() with djgpp<=2.03, I use src/libc/ansi/stdio/vsnprntf.c
>> from djgpp 2.04 directly included in my sources with __stropenw() and
>> __strclosew() helpers pasted from include/libc/file.h into it.
>>
>> This seems successful fo me, so far.  Are there any problems with this
>> that I am not aware of?
>
> Don't know offhand, you'll just have to try it and see.   :-))
>


I did, and it seems to work fine, even with djgpp as old as 2.0.0 :)
I just wanted to know whether there are any requirements that I
don't know.


> P.S. I think libsupp supports those, which might be a cleaner way of
> getting it.
>

Well cleaner is arguable, there are lots of stuff in libsupp that I don't
care about one bit, so this was the easiest and most straightforward
for me.

Thanks.

--
O.S.

- Raw text -