X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: [cyd AT stupidchicken DOT com: Emacs 23.1.91 pretest]
Date:	Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:39:26 -0800 (PST)
Organization:	http://groups.google.com
Lines:	35
Message-ID:	<80fb313b-736e-437b-bc5b-3042313388e1@z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>
References:	<83ws03ezo5 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <13650ca6-9404-4ad7-bfc0-af9d64db7510 AT m3g2000yqf DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<83skaqgaj3 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	65.13.115.246
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	posting.google.com 1262291966 12977 127.0.0.1 (31 Dec 2009 20:39:26 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:39:26 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	z41g2000yqz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246;
	posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US)
	AppleWebKit/532.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/3.0.195.38 Safari/532.0,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Bytes:	2528
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

On Dec 31, 2:21=A0pm, Eli Zaretskii <e DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
> > From: Rugxulo <rugx DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com>
> > Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:31:42 -0800 (PST)
> > Bytes: 2261
>
> > BTW, we still don't even have an official 23.1 package for DJGPP yet.
> > I know you're extremely busy, so I definitely don't expect you to do
> > it.
>
> Well, I thought I'd do it, but got even busier: Emacs switched to
> Bazaar as its VCS,

I'm surprised it's not Git, considering how beloved that is these days
(Perl, NASM, Stone Soup).

> and I'm working on adding bidirectional editing to it. =A0

.sdrawkcab daer t'nac I  (but I guess you can)       ;-)

> So no promises, unfortunately.

I didn't expect any. Two questions, though:

1). Are there any files that have hardcoded data (e.g. paths) in them
that should be avoided when making the .ZIP? Anything that would be
site-specific or only run in LFNs (or SFNs), etc.? Just off the top of
your head.
2). Would it be horribly wrong to make /beta/ use the SYSTEM_MALLOC
build (e.g. Vista)? I figure /current/ can be normal, so users at
least have a choice and don't have to recompile.

BTW, thanks for your efforts on this editor, it's obviously very
useful. And DOS ain't dead yet!

- Raw text -