X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date:	Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:25:48 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<01c4e515$Blat.v2.2.2$ff8078a0@zahav.net.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2
In-reply-to:	<41c40fe4$0$175$cc7c7865@news.luth.se> (message from Martin
	Str|mberg on 18 Dec 2004 11:09:24 GMT)
Subject:	Re: Problems with timer interrupt chaining and SmartDrv
References:	<001701c4e2f2$e397dcc0$e1b92951 AT josepmariaxp> <01c4e32a$Blat.v2.2.2$fb750ba0 AT zahav DOT net DOT il> <20041216081608 DOT GA17913 AT webhome DOT cz> <01c4e368$Blat.v2.2.2$592f6a00 AT zahav DOT net DOT il> <41c40fe4$0$175$cc7c7865 AT news DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT speedy DOT ludd DOT ltu DOT se>
> Date: 18 Dec 2004 11:09:24 GMT
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org> wrote:
> > It sounds like you are assuming that DMA is faster than PIO.  That was
> > so once, long ago, mainly with floppy drives, but is no longer true
> > since ATA interfaces conquered the PC land.  Nowadays, PIO is faster
> > than DMA, so AFAIK DMA is no longer used in disk I/O.
> 
> For DOS maybe, not for a multitasking system.

Do you mean DMA is used on multitasking systems?  Or do you mean PIO
is only faster on DOS, not on multitasking systems?

If the latter, please explain.

- Raw text -