From:	colonel_hack AT yahoo DOT com (Colonel CC Hack)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.4dos,comp.os.msdos.apps,comp.os.msdos.desqview,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.os.msdos.mail-news
Subject:	Re: regarding dos 640kb barrier
Date:	11 Aug 2003 18:18:50 -0700
Organization:	http://groups.google.com/
Lines:	22
Message-ID:	<480e9d8d.0308111718.251b77ad@posting.google.com>
References:	<f88a27e4 DOT 0307300042 DOT 5b60b7fe AT posting DOT google DOT com> <bgq9so$2d5q$1 AT borg DOT svpal DOT org>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	68.104.147.17
X-Trace:	posting.google.com 1060651130 1849 127.0.0.1 (12 Aug 2003 01:18:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	12 Aug 2003 01:18:50 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> In comp.os.msdos.desqview yogesh <ypjofficial AT indiatimes DOT com> wrote:
> hi all!!
 
> i have one question whose convincing answer i couldn' find in any
> book.
> everybody knows that dos has 640kb barrier..and hence this makes dos
> inefficient...
> my question is if dos is such a weak operating system..then why
> somebody like microsoft(creater of ms dos)didn't redesigned dos so


This smells a *lot* like a troll. If yer not, try searching for
threads with 100+ messages on this topic on google. Nothing new
will be added here, --any correct answer will be swamped in garbage,
so there is no need for others to answer if this is mere a ``mock
troll'' (hint: wrong info has already been posted in *all* the answers
that have shown up on my server).

And get involved with the freedos project if you really want the
world to have a really a good dos.

  CC reading in comp.os.msdos.desqview

- Raw text -