From:	Necroscope <guln AT rogers DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: dos quake compiling, help!! typos.. re-read
Message-ID:	<2m6tmus7apbg6bui2jrhgj7r3t3r16ntpi@4ax.com>
References:	<20020818220338 DOT 27104 DOT qmail AT web20201 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <20020819061207 DOT 13096 DOT qmail AT web20204 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <fr9dmu8lusr20r98nhv0g4t7nd3dbm8tsi AT 4ax DOT com> <akcu2g$1h172m$1 AT ID-49635 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	22
Date:	Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:11:50 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	24.102.32.191
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT rogers DOT com
X-Trace:	news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com 1030659110 24.102.32.191 (Thu, 29 Aug 2002 18:11:50 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Thu, 29 Aug 2002 18:11:50 EDT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On 26 Aug 2002 09:57:37 GMT, "Thomas Mueller" <tmueller AT bluegrass DOT net>
wrote:

>Excerpt from Necroscope <guln AT rogers DOT com>:
>
>> Uhm... there is no 640x200 resolution.  Perhaps you mean 640x400?  I'm
>> still not understanding this, though.  Sure, raising the resolution
>> slow things down, but no matter what, it always tries to run at a
>> steady and consistent rate.
>
>Sure there is a 640 * 200 resolution: mode 6 (CGA, 2 colors) and mode 14
>(EGA and VGA, 16 colors).  But EGA has 640 * 350 with 16 colors, and VGA has
>640 * 480, so we rarely see 640 * 200.  Now this is largely superseded by
>SVGA.

My bad, then. :(

Does 640x200 function similar to 320x200?  That is, it's a
scanline-doubled mode?

-- 
Andrew Jones

- Raw text -