From:	Martin Str|mberg <ams AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Subject:	Re: DJGPP r.i.p :( ?
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<1029062722 DOT 562005 AT queeg DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <20020811165528 DOT 02547 DOT 00003813 AT mb-cl DOT aol DOT com>
User-Agent:	tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (NetBSD/1.5_BETA (alpha))
Message-ID:	<1029165976.153138@queeg.ludd.luth.se>
Cache-Post-Path:	queeg.ludd.luth.se!unknown AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se
X-Cache:	nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
Date:	12 Aug 2002 15:26:16 GMT
Lines:	13
NNTP-Posting-Date:	12 Aug 2002 15:26:16 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	queeg.ludd.luth.se
X-Trace:	1029165976 news.luth.se 439 130.240.16.109
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

AAndrewas <aandrewas AT aol DOT com> wrote:
:>Look. You've been waiting to Allegro to be fixed, right? Nothing yet,
:>right? So it looks like you are the one to change this. Nice to be
:>singled out and know your purpose, isn't it?

: Or perhaps it dosent need to be fixed because it works fine already? 

That's a possibily too: only Raf(sp?)'s setup need fixing?


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -