From:	"Charles Sandmann" <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Thoughts on physical address and DMA
Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:58:13
Organization:	Aspen Technology, Inc.
Lines:	12
Message-ID:	<3b8141a5.sandmann@clio.rice.edu>
References:	<f5c79439 DOT 0108171412 DOT 689b2a6b AT posting DOT google DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	dcloan.hou.aspentech.com
X-Trace:	selma.aspentech.com 998344964 13302 10.32.115.107 (20 Aug 2001 22:02:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	postmaster AT aspentech DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	20 Aug 2001 22:02:44 GMT
X-NewsEditor:	ED-1.5.8
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

> Since you add `__djgpp_conventional_base' to a physical address to
> convert it to a linear address, could you possibly _subtract_ it from
> a linear address to convert it to a physical address? If so, could the
> physical address be used for DMA?

Doing DMA under DPMI is a somewhat specialized operation.  To make this
note short, you would need to know what platforms you plan to support
(DOS/CWSDPMI, Windows, etc).  The traditional way is to allocate a
DOS memory buffer which has 1:1 address mapping.  If you need a large
buffer, and run only under CWSDPMI, you can grab a work in progress
http://clio.rice.edu/djgpp/cwsdma2.zip for an example of how to get
the real address mapping.

- Raw text -